A recent doctoral thesis from the University of Oslo raises the question of whether Hamsun acknowledged guilt after World War II had ended.
TRIED FOR TREASON : In 1947, Knut Hamsun was ordered to pay 425.000 NOK in compensation for his alleged membership in National Gathering. The Supreme Court later reduced the compensation to 325.000 NOK. This image shows Hamsun outside the courthouse in Grimstad. Photo: Knut Skarland/NTB.
“Hamsun did everything in his power to ensure that the Nazis would be successful during World War II. The widespread consensus is that he never regretted any of his ideologically motivated actions. I am challenging this understanding and I believe that our image of Hamsun in this respect should be revised,” says Birgitte Furberg Moe.
She recently defended her thesis entitled “The genesis of the text and dealing with guilt in Knut Hamsun’s On Overgrown Paths" (norwegian).
Reflections on guilt
In her work, she examines the origins of the controversial classic, a book that Hamsun wrote while he was on trial for committing treason. Writing in the first person, he shares his thoughts, ranging from his childhood memories to events and thoughts he had after he was arrested in May 1945.
Furberg Moe has highlighted the theme of guilt in this autobiographical work – and she has examined what this can tell us about Hamsun's own feelings of guilt or remorse after the end of the war.
“I am seeking to show that this work contains reflections about guilt and the difficult human process of acknowledging what might be involved in admitting that a serious mistake has been committed. Despite the fact that the work also contains an air of self-righteous innocence and vicitimhood, I believe Hamsun also acknowledged some of his guilt and was hoping that society would forgive him. Guilt and remorse are closely linked,” she says and continues:
“This totality emerges after studying a number of sources derived from the years when he wrote the work, as well as a close reading of the work."
The writing process provides important knowledgeHAS EXAMINED ON OVERGROWN PATHS: Birgitte Furberg Moe has highlighted the theme of guilt in the work.
She notes that an important starting point for the work has been how an examination of the author's writing process could provide us with significant insights about the published text.
Furberg Moe has therefore studied more than 270 letters that Hamsun wrote between 1945 and 1949, manuscripts, notes and several versions of the speech he gave to the court during his trial, as well as his diary from the time he spent in a psychiatric clinic. She has also reviewed many other related letters and texts.
“This has provided me with a comprehensive understanding of how Hamsun wrote On Overgrown Paths, the motivation behind his writing, and the kind of relationship that exists between text and reality. Among other things, examining all this material helped to clarify the allegorical aspects of the text.”
Hamsun turned to Christianity
In Hamsun’s book, Furberg Moe has found clear indications of an author who is seeking sympathy, as well as making excuses for his actions during the war. However, she has also found reflections on sin and guilt.
“The work contains a partial acknowledgment of guilt. Hamsun was hedging his bets. His attempts to reduce his guilt while simultaneously and implicitly admitting a degree of guilt appear to serve as a rhetorical strategy designed to influence public opinion in order to reduce the hatred and condemnation against him. At the same time, it was not simply rhetoric. Hamsun turned towards Christianity after the war, something which affected the content of his book and the way it should be read,” she claims.
“During the winter of 1945–46, Hamsun was forcibly admitted to a psychiatric clinic in Oslo as part of the treason case against him. He then experienced the greatest crisis of his life and turned towards God for comfort and help, as evidenced in his letters and his diary. In the Christian God, he rediscovered his childhood faith and a new point of reference as a result of the defeat after the war," explains Furberg Moe.
This affects the way in which one should read On Overgrown Paths, and not least how we should interpret all the religious references and allusions contained in the book.
“The Christian theme reflects his faith in God and a genuine reflection on guilt and forgiveness. In this context, one needs to distinguish between legal and religious guilt,” she says, and continues:
“Actually, I think the title of the work alludes to the fact that Hamsun was on the wrong path during the war.”
We should not excuse him
Furberg Moe also points out that Hamsun's friend, Christian Gierløff, provided Hamsun with advice about his writing during the period 1945-49. He helped to enlighten Hamsun about the wrongdoings he had committed during the war and Furberg Moe believes that he actually made Hamsun realise his mistake to some extent.
“At the same time, it is important to highlight that Hamsun denied being a member of National Gathering and that Gierløff supported him in the subsequent civil liability case brought against him.”
While Furberg Moe thinks that our image of Hamsun should be revised, she does not suggest that we should excuse his Nazism or his support for the German occupying forces. “His deeds during World War II were much darker than many people realise,” she says.
During her doctoral work, she came across unknown letters showing the Hamsun family's close connections with Paul Grassmann who was the German press attaché in Stockholm during the Hitler Regime. He ensured that pro-Nazi texts by Hamsun were printed.
She also found a previously unknown Hamsun text in which the author expresses deep gratitude towards Germany. This text was published by the Nazi propaganda organisation the Nordische Gesellschaft.DENIAL OF GUILT: Knut Hamsun denied his membership in National Gathering. This image shows Hamsun during his trial in Grimstad courthouse, December 1947. Photo: Sverre Heiberg/Dagbladet.
Room for forgiveness?
“It is important that we condemn Hamsun's actions and do not underestimate them, something that Hamsun himself tried to do in On Overgrown Paths. He was largely successful in raising subsequent confusion about his role during the war and the fact that he had not been warned about his political views. This was simply not the case, but a strategic lie,” says Furberg Moe.
She points out that an important aim of his book was designed to influence the reader's emotions and turn public opinion away from condemnation towards compassion, so that he and his family could have peace.
“Today, we should read On Overgrown Paths primarily as a text about Hamsun's role during the war, the consequences thereof, and his existential deliberations during his trial for treason. However, it is also important to include the Christian theme that reflects faith in God and sincere reflections on guilt and forgiveness,” she says, and continues:
“There may be something conciliatory in the fact that Hamsun seems to have acknowledged parts of his guilt related to what he had been involved in, and that his book contains the potential for hidden remorse. But the question of whether or not there is room for forgiveness should be left up to each of us.”